The Origin and Devolvement of Language
v
Language; primarily something that is spoken
Before
setting out to make a study of the development of the English language, there
are some elementary facts that
we should get clearly into our minds. The first thing to realize is that language is primarily something that is spoken, not written. The introduction
of a system of recording thought and speech by writing (and later by printing)
was a very important step forward. But printing and writing are only
substitutes for speech. In its primary sense language as the term ‘implies’ is
oral. That printing and writing have certainly had an influence on the
development of language.
v
language is evolutionary, not static
Secondly
we must realize is that language
is evolutionary, not static. Change is
constantly going on. e.g. Chaucer’s English and English or modern time is quite
different. The same is revealed by a comparison of modern French with old
French.
Though
this evolutionary factor is obvious, there is frequently a tendency to assume
that it is a thing of the past and at least in all civilized countries,
language has novel become more or less, set and fixed but this is far from the
truth, certain changes are notable. e.g. A grammatical construction which was
not tolerated but in his school days but now tolerated. After the establishment
of B.B.C. (correct standard) a number of words are in a process of
modification. That is why F. T. Wood remarks, It seems reasonable to
assume that the farther back in the history of language, we go the easier and
more rapid was the process of change,
for conservation were less active.
v language differentiates man him from the other
animal species
In the third place, it should be realized that
speech or language is the distinguishing characteristic of man which
differentiates him from the other animal species. Every tribe or race of human
beings speaks a language of some kind. But the question arises why was it the
one particular species which we call the human, pasted from the utterance,
which we may call primitive speech. The answer perhaps it is the development of
mind. The species which developed mind and personality also developed speech.
Sir. G. Elliot Smith was certainly correct when he said, “The
discovery of speech marked the beginning of man.
It is matter of dispute
what precisely was the origin of language and its development. At present four
chief theories hold the field. They are as follow. (1) The Bow-Wow theory, (2)
The ding-dong theory (3) The pooh-pooh theory, (4) The gesture theory.
v
The bow-wow theory:-
According to this theory, the
earliest speech was produced by man’s attempting to imitate some characteristic
sound of the creature or the object to which he was referring. It is
possibility that he adopting habits and manner which our adult ancestors had
many years ago. It is the animal that says, ‘Bow-Wow’ and so very soon a child
begin to call it a bow-wow. Certain some words whose roots seem to go back to
very ancient time would support such an assumption. e.g. ‘snake’, wind’, water. e.g. while
speaking them, their form is assumed through sounds.
v
The ding-dong theory:-
The
second theory is the dingdong theory, usually associated with the eminent
German scholar Maxmuller, though others have adopted it. This theory holds that
the beginnings of language are to be found in the sense of rhythm, which seems
to have been innate in man from a very primitive stage, which is essentially
rhythmical. Again this theory falls back on the tendency to imitation. e.g.
Observing a certain rhythm in the swaying of the trees in the wind, Everyman
‘ding-donged’ phonetically perhaps there is also some connection with the habit
of whistling. This theory brings us close to savage war-dance and the medieval
ballads and the sea-chauties.
v
The pooh-pooh theory:-
This
theory has become known as ‘pooh-pooh theory’ the expression as employed in the
phrase to ‘pooh-pooh a scheme’,
is the present-day illustration of the principle. At first pooh-pooh is just an
explanation implying contempt or disgust. This theory is based on all forms of
speech utterance like emotional interjections pain, surprise, pleasure and
wonder. Our present more national language is actually a refinement of our
brute noises.
v
The Gesture Theory:-
Finally
there is the theory advanced by Wilhelm Want and later restated by Sir Richard
Puget in his book ‘Human Speech’. By this theory it means that the earliest
method of commutation was by sign and gesture made with hands. Such a language
was natural and spontaneous and ever we use it today. When we beckon to a
person to come towards us, now through this theory every gesture of the hand is
accompanied by the moments of the tongue, lips or sign language to spoken
language. e.g. when one lifts the arm to point upwards, the tongue also rises
so that the tip of it points towards the top palate.
Having
examined the four theories concerning the origin of human speech, we may
conclude that speech was the result of a combination of processes rather than
of any particular process. It is a problem for those whose researches lie in
the fields of language and philology. F.T. Wood says, There is something to be said
for them all but none seems real satisfactory. Perhaps the truth is that each
is correct upto a point but only upto a point.
No comments:
Post a Comment